Aembit vs Anchor.dev
Aembit vs Anchor.dev, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aembit is on 58/100 and Anchor.dev on 13/100.
Where each one leads
Aembit
- our overall score: 58/100 against 13/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 57/100 against 30/100
Anchor.dev
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Aembit | Anchor.dev |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Workload Identity and Access Management (IAM) platform for securing non-human identities and AI agents. | Security certificate management for developers, now part of Keycard Labs. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Identity & Access Management, AI Agent Security, Workload Identity | Cybersecurity, Developer Tools, Infrastructure, Identity & Access Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aembit | Anchor.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +318.5% | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,780 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aembit | Anchor.dev |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 13/100 |
| Traction | 17/100 | Not published |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 6/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aembit | Anchor.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Flyio |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Zendesk | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Aembit vs Anchor.dev: common questions
Which is better, Aembit or Anchor.dev?
On our 0-100 score Aembit rates higher (58/100 against 13/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aembit and Anchor.dev compare on the numbers?
Aembit leads on our overall score (58/100 against 13/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 41/100), domain rating (57/100 against 30/100).
Read the full Aembit review and pricing or the Anchor.dev review and pricing. You can also browse other Aembit alternatives we track.