AECOM vs Fluor
AECOM vs Fluor, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AECOM is on 22/100 and Fluor on 64/100.
Where each one leads
AECOM
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 72/100
- headcount: 62,701 against 1,200
Fluor
- our overall score: 64/100 against 22/100
- funding raised: $25B against $1.7B
At a glance
| Measure | AECOM | Fluor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global infrastructure leader providing design, consulting, construction, and management services. | Global engineering, procurement, and construction services for complex projects across various industries. |
| Category | Infrastructure, Engineering, Construction, Government Services | Engineering, Construction, Energy, Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 1990 | 1912 |
| Headquarters | Dallas, USA | Irving, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AECOM | Fluor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 62,701 | 1,200 |
| Total funding | $1.7B | $25B |
| Latest round | Public | Public |
| Valuation | $11B | $28B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AECOM | Fluor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 22/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 16/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 10/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AECOM | Fluor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
AECOM vs Fluor: common questions
Which is better, AECOM or Fluor?
On our 0-100 score Fluor rates higher (64/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AECOM and Fluor compare on the numbers?
AECOM leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 37/100), domain rating (80/100 against 72/100), headcount (62,701 against 1,200). Fluor leads on our overall score (64/100 against 22/100), funding raised ($25B against $1.7B).
Read the full AECOM review and pricing or the Fluor review and pricing. You can also browse other AECOM alternatives we track.