Advanced Cyclone Systems vs Gradiant
Advanced Cyclone Systems vs Gradiant, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Advanced Cyclone Systems is on 17/100 and Gradiant on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Advanced Cyclone Systems
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Gradiant
- our overall score: 61/100 against 17/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 16/100
- headcount: 859 against 22
- LinkedIn following: 82,956 against 4,005
At a glance
| Measure | Advanced Cyclone Systems | Gradiant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | High-efficiency cyclone systems for industrial particle capture and resource recovery. | End-to-end water and wastewater treatment solutions for critical industries. |
| Category | Industrial Automation, Environmental Tech, Resource Recovery, Dust Collection | Water Treatment, Wastewater Treatment, Industrial Water, Resource Recovery |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software | hardware | services | platform |
| Founded | 2008 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Porto, Portugal | Newton, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Advanced Cyclone Systems | Gradiant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22 | 859 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +16.2% |
| Total funding | Not published | $804M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,005 | 82,956 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Advanced Cyclone Systems | Gradiant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 17/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 14/100 | Not published |
| Team | Not published | 36/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 16/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Advanced Cyclone Systems | Gradiant |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Advanced Cyclone Systems vs Gradiant: common questions
Which is better, Advanced Cyclone Systems or Gradiant?
On our 0-100 score Gradiant rates higher (61/100 against 17/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Advanced Cyclone Systems and Gradiant compare on the numbers?
Gradiant leads on our overall score (61/100 against 17/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 22/100), domain rating (55/100 against 16/100), headcount (859 against 22), LinkedIn following (82,956 against 4,005).
Read the full Advanced Cyclone Systems review and pricing or the Gradiant review and pricing. You can also browse other Advanced Cyclone Systems alternatives we track.