Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. vs Cisco
Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. vs Cisco, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. is on 58/100 and Cisco on 83/100.
Where each one leads
Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd.
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 58/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 59
- funding raised: $220B against $296M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 7,514
At a glance
| Measure | Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A Chinese technology company specializing in optical connectivity solutions for AI data centers, networks, and telecom operators, reportedly planning a Hong Kong IPO. | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions |
| Category | Optical Connectivity, Data Center Infrastructure, Telecom Infrastructure, Fiber Optics | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B Hardware / SaaS |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2007 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen, China | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 59 | 95,924 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +4.2% |
| Total funding | $296M | $220B |
| Latest round | Pre-IPO | Seed |
| Valuation | $4.0B | $240B |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,514 | 7,660,767 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 83/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 67/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 21/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | Khoros |
Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. vs Cisco: common questions
Which is better, Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. or Cisco?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. and Cisco compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 58/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 30/100), domain rating (91/100 against 21/100), headcount (95,924 against 59), funding raised ($220B against $296M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 7,514).
Read the full Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. review and pricing or the Cisco review and pricing. You can also browse other Shenzhen Adtek Technology Co., Ltd. alternatives we track.