Adept AI vs Phases
Adept AI vs Phases, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Adept AI is on 71/100 and Phases on 29/100.
Where each one leads
Adept AI
- our overall score: 71/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 75 against 3
Phases
- agent readiness: 68/100 against 34/100
At a glance
| Measure | Adept AI | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI company building agents that automate software workflows and digital assistants. | Phases is building the first full-stack AI agent company to automate clinical trials for pharma companies, starting with patient recruitment. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Multimodal AI | Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Not published |
| Founded | 2017 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Adept AI | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 75 | 3 |
| Total funding | $1.2B | Not published |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 35,140 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Adept AI | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 71/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 6/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 69/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | C (68/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 22/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Adept AI | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Adept AI | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI-Powered Patient Recruitment, Automated Medical Record Review, Efficient Screening Conversations, 24/7 Patient Engagement & Scalability, Seamless Integration, Cost Reduction & Trial Acceleration |
Adept AI vs Phases: common questions
Which is better, Adept AI or Phases?
On our 0-100 score Adept AI rates higher (71/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Adept AI and Phases compare on the numbers?
Adept AI leads on our overall score (71/100 against 29/100), domain rating (71/100 against 22/100), headcount (75 against 3). Phases leads on agent readiness (68/100 against 34/100).
Read the full Adept AI review and pricing or the Phases review and pricing. You can also browse other Adept AI alternatives we track.