Adecco vs Clipboard Health
Adecco vs Clipboard Health, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Adecco is on 38/100 and Clipboard Health on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Adecco
- domain rating: 76/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 22,445 against 3,596
- LinkedIn following: 2,317,495 against 79,245
Clipboard Health
- our overall score: 69/100 against 38/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 36/100
- headcount growth: +500.0% against +5.3%
At a glance
| Measure | Adecco | Clipboard Health |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global talent and technology advisory company providing workforce solutions and talent development. | Marketplace connecting healthcare facilities with per diem nurses and allied health professionals for flexible shifts. |
| Category | Workforce Solutions, Talent Acquisition, Recruitment, Human Resources | HealthTech, Healthcare Staffing, Marketplace, Nursing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Marketplace |
| Founded | 1997 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Zurich, Switzerland | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Adecco | Clipboard Health |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22,445 | 3,596 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.3% | +500.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $80.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,317,495 | 79,245 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Adecco | Clipboard Health |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 38/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 69/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Adecco | Clipboard Health |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, React, Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Branch |
| Open source | No | Yes, 64 GitHub stars |
Adecco vs Clipboard Health: common questions
Which is better, Adecco or Clipboard Health?
On our 0-100 score Clipboard Health rates higher (69/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Adecco and Clipboard Health compare on the numbers?
Adecco leads on domain rating (76/100 against 54/100), headcount (22,445 against 3,596), LinkedIn following (2,317,495 against 79,245). Clipboard Health leads on our overall score (69/100 against 38/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 36/100), headcount growth (+500.0% against +5.3%).
Read the full Adecco review and pricing or the Clipboard Health review and pricing. You can also browse other Adecco alternatives we track.