Addverb vs Uma
Addverb vs Uma, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Addverb is on 70/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Addverb
- our overall score: 70/100 against 58/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 1,316 against 29
- funding raised: $252M against $40.0M
- LinkedIn following: 110,631 against 5,831
Uma
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 34/100
At a glance
| Measure | Addverb | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global robotics and automation company providing solutions for warehouses and factories. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Warehouse Robotics, Industrial Automation, Supply Chain | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Noida, India | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Addverb | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,316 | 29 |
| Total funding | $252M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 110,631 | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Addverb | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 53/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 91/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Addverb | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager |
Addverb vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, Addverb or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Addverb rates higher (70/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Addverb and Uma compare on the numbers?
Addverb leads on our overall score (70/100 against 58/100), domain rating (59/100 against 36/100), headcount (1,316 against 29), funding raised ($252M against $40.0M), LinkedIn following (110,631 against 5,831). Uma leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 34/100).
Read the full Addverb review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other Addverb alternatives we track.