Addressable vs imToken
Addressable vs imToken, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Addressable is on 61/100 and imToken on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Addressable
- our overall score: 61/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 32/100
imToken
- domain rating: 78/100 against 35/100
- funding raised: $40.0M against $13.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Addressable | imToken |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Web3 growth suite for targeted user acquisition on social and web channels. | A secure and trusted non-custodial digital wallet for accessing the tokenized world. |
| Category | Web3, User Acquisition, Enterprise, AdTech | Web3, DeFi, Crypto Exchange, Digital Wallet |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Singapore, Singapore |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Addressable | imToken |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 48 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $13.5M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,078 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Addressable | imToken |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 38/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 7/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 35/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Addressable | imToken |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Addressable vs imToken: common questions
Which is better, Addressable or imToken?
On our 0-100 score Addressable rates higher (61/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Addressable and imToken compare on the numbers?
Addressable leads on our overall score (61/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 32/100). imToken leads on domain rating (78/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($40.0M against $13.5M).
Read the full Addressable review and pricing or the imToken review and pricing. You can also browse other Addressable alternatives we track.