Addressable vs Immutable X
Addressable vs Immutable X, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Addressable is on 61/100 and Immutable X on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Addressable
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Immutable X
- our overall score: 66/100 against 61/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 213 against 48
- funding raised: $62.4M against $13.5M
- LinkedIn following: 56,539 against 5,078
At a glance
| Measure | Addressable | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Web3 growth suite for targeted user acquisition on social and web channels. | A Layer 2 scaling solution for NFTs on Ethereum, offering gas-free minting and trading. |
| Category | Web3, User Acquisition, Enterprise, AdTech | Web3, Blockchain, NFT, DeFi |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Melbourne, Australia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Addressable | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 48 | 213 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $13.5M | $62.4M |
| Latest round | Seed | ICO |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,078 | 56,539 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Addressable | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 35/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Addressable | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | PostHog |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Addressable vs Immutable X: common questions
Which is better, Addressable or Immutable X?
On our 0-100 score Immutable X rates higher (66/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Addressable and Immutable X compare on the numbers?
Immutable X leads on our overall score (66/100 against 61/100), domain rating (74/100 against 35/100), headcount (213 against 48), funding raised ($62.4M against $13.5M), LinkedIn following (56,539 against 5,078).
Read the full Addressable review and pricing or the Immutable X review and pricing. You can also browse other Addressable alternatives we track.