Addressable vs CyVers
Addressable vs CyVers, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Addressable is on 61/100 and CyVers on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Addressable
- our overall score: 61/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 48 against 37
- headcount growth: +500.0% against +13.2%
- funding raised: $13.5M against $9.0M
CyVers
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 48/100
At a glance
| Measure | Addressable | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Web3 growth suite for targeted user acquisition on social and web channels. | Web3 attack remediation platform using geometric machine learning for real-time cryptocurrency attack detection. |
| Category | Web3, User Acquisition, Enterprise, AdTech | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Addressable | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 48 | 37 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | +13.2% |
| Total funding | $13.5M | $9.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,078 | 5,336 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Addressable | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 35/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Addressable | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Render |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Base44 |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Addressable vs CyVers: common questions
Which is better, Addressable or CyVers?
On our 0-100 score Addressable rates higher (61/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Addressable and CyVers compare on the numbers?
Addressable leads on our overall score (61/100 against 55/100), headcount (48 against 37), headcount growth (+500.0% against +13.2%), funding raised ($13.5M against $9.0M). CyVers leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 48/100).
Read the full Addressable review and pricing or the CyVers review and pricing. You can also browse other Addressable alternatives we track.