Addionics vs Robomer
Addionics vs Robomer, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Addionics is on 65/100 and Robomer on 10/100.
Where each one leads
Addionics
- our overall score: 65/100 against 10/100
- domain rating: 47/100 against 1/100
- LinkedIn following: 12,213 against 21
Robomer
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Addionics | Robomer |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops advanced rechargeable batteries using a novel 3D metal fabrication method for enhanced performance. | Elektronik ve robotik malzemeleri satan, aynı gün teslimat ve iade garantisi sunan bir e-ticaret platformu. |
| Category | Battery, 3D, Energy, 3D Printing | E-commerce, Robotics, Electronics, STEM Education |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Marketplace |
| Founded | 2017 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | İstanbul, Turkey |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Addionics | Robomer |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 90 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +33.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $73.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,213 | 21 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Addionics | Robomer |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 10/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 9/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 1/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Addionics | Robomer |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, React, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Addionics vs Robomer: common questions
Which is better, Addionics or Robomer?
On our 0-100 score Addionics rates higher (65/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Addionics and Robomer compare on the numbers?
Addionics leads on our overall score (65/100 against 10/100), domain rating (47/100 against 1/100), LinkedIn following (12,213 against 21).
Read the full Addionics review and pricing or the Robomer review and pricing. You can also browse other Addionics alternatives we track.