Addionics vs QuantumScape
Addionics vs QuantumScape, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Addionics is on 65/100 and QuantumScape on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Addionics
- our overall score: 65/100 against 52/100
QuantumScape
- domain rating: 61/100 against 47/100
- funding raised: $1.3B against $73.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Addionics | QuantumScape |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops advanced rechargeable batteries using a novel 3D metal fabrication method for enhanced performance. | Developing solid-state lithium-metal batteries for electric vehicles to enable faster charging, longer range, and enhanced safety. |
| Category | Battery, 3D, Energy, 3D Printing | Energy Tech, Auto, Auto Tech, Energy Storage Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Addionics | QuantumScape |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 90 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +33.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $73.0M | $1.3B |
| Latest round | Series B | Series Unknown |
| Valuation | Not published | $4.7B |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,213 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Addionics | QuantumScape |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Addionics | QuantumScape |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Addionics vs QuantumScape: common questions
Which is better, Addionics or QuantumScape?
On our 0-100 score Addionics rates higher (65/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Addionics and QuantumScape compare on the numbers?
Addionics leads on our overall score (65/100 against 52/100). QuantumScape leads on domain rating (61/100 against 47/100), funding raised ($1.3B against $73.0M).
Read the full Addionics review and pricing or the QuantumScape review and pricing. You can also browse other Addionics alternatives we track.