Adaptive Security vs Skybox Security
Adaptive Security vs Skybox Security, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Adaptive Security is on 39/100 and Skybox Security on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Adaptive Security
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 37/100
Skybox Security
- our overall score: 50/100 against 39/100
- headcount: 506 against 257
- funding raised: $240M against $55.0M
- LinkedIn following: 52,901 against 17,059
At a glance
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Skybox Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Adaptive Security provides a cloud-native security platform for modern applications and infrastructure. | Tufin provides a security policy management platform that automates network security changes and ensures continuous compliance across hybrid environments. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Threat Detection, DevSecOps | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Network Security, Security Policy Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2002 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Skybox Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 257 | 506 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +10.1% |
| Total funding | $55.0M | $240M |
| Latest round | Not published | Private Equity |
| Valuation | Not published | $40.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,059 | 52,901 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Skybox Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Skybox Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Adaptive Security vs Skybox Security: common questions
Which is better, Adaptive Security or Skybox Security?
On our 0-100 score Skybox Security rates higher (50/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Adaptive Security and Skybox Security compare on the numbers?
Adaptive Security leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 37/100). Skybox Security leads on our overall score (50/100 against 39/100), headcount (506 against 257), funding raised ($240M against $55.0M), LinkedIn following (52,901 against 17,059).
Read the full Adaptive Security review and pricing or the Skybox Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Adaptive Security alternatives we track.

