Adaptive Security vs Lacework
Adaptive Security vs Lacework, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Adaptive Security is on 39/100 and Lacework on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Adaptive Security
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 257 against 168
Lacework
- our overall score: 54/100 against 39/100
- funding raised: $1.3B against $55.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Lacework |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Adaptive Security provides a cloud-native security platform for modern applications and infrastructure. | Data-driven cloud security platform providing automated threat detection and compliance across multi-cloud environments. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Threat Detection, DevSecOps | AI, SaaS, Cybersecurity, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Lacework |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 257 | 168 |
| Total funding | $55.0M | $1.3B |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $8.3B |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,059 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Lacework |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Lacework |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Adaptive Security vs Lacework: common questions
Which is better, Adaptive Security or Lacework?
On our 0-100 score Lacework rates higher (54/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Adaptive Security and Lacework compare on the numbers?
Adaptive Security leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 21/100), headcount (257 against 168). Lacework leads on our overall score (54/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($1.3B against $55.0M).
Read the full Adaptive Security review and pricing or the Lacework review and pricing. You can also browse other Adaptive Security alternatives we track.