Adaptive Security vs Cycode
Adaptive Security vs Cycode, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Adaptive Security is on 39/100 and Cycode on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Adaptive Security
- headcount: 257 against 134
- LinkedIn following: 17,059 against 7,549
Cycode
- our overall score: 65/100 against 39/100
- funding raised: $80.6M against $55.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Cycode |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Adaptive Security provides a cloud-native security platform for modern applications and infrastructure. | AppSec platform with built-in ASPM for unified security, development, and operations. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Threat Detection, DevSecOps | Cybersecurity, Information Technology (IT), Enterprise, Code |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Cycode |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 257 | 134 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +52.1% |
| Total funding | $55.0M | $80.6M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,059 | 7,549 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Cycode |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 100/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Cycode |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Alpinejs |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Adaptive Security vs Cycode: common questions
Which is better, Adaptive Security or Cycode?
On our 0-100 score Cycode rates higher (65/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Adaptive Security and Cycode compare on the numbers?
Adaptive Security leads on headcount (257 against 134), LinkedIn following (17,059 against 7,549). Cycode leads on our overall score (65/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($80.6M against $55.0M).
Read the full Adaptive Security review and pricing or the Cycode review and pricing. You can also browse other Adaptive Security alternatives we track.