Adaptive Security vs Aikido Security
Adaptive Security vs Aikido Security, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Adaptive Security is on 39/100 and Aikido Security on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Adaptive Security
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 7/100
Aikido Security
- our overall score: 65/100 against 39/100
- funding raised: $84.4M against $55.0M
- LinkedIn following: 35,410 against 17,059
At a glance
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Aikido Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Adaptive Security provides a cloud-native security platform for modern applications and infrastructure. | Developer-first security platform providing continuous AI-driven penetration testing and vulnerability remediation. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Threat Detection, DevSecOps | Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, Artificial Intelligence, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Ghent, Belgium |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Aikido Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 257 | Not published |
| Total funding | $55.0M | $84.4M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,059 | 35,410 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Aikido Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 6/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 7/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Adaptive Security | Aikido Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Adaptive Security vs Aikido Security: common questions
Which is better, Adaptive Security or Aikido Security?
On our 0-100 score Aikido Security rates higher (65/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Adaptive Security and Aikido Security compare on the numbers?
Adaptive Security leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 22/100), domain rating (75/100 against 7/100). Aikido Security leads on our overall score (65/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($84.4M against $55.0M), LinkedIn following (35,410 against 17,059).
Read the full Adaptive Security review and pricing or the Aikido Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Adaptive Security alternatives we track.

