Adaptive Biotechnologies vs MacroGenics
Adaptive Biotechnologies vs MacroGenics, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Adaptive Biotechnologies is on 69/100 and MacroGenics on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Adaptive Biotechnologies
- our overall score: 69/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 50/100
- funding raised: $300M against $13.5M
MacroGenics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Adaptive Biotechnologies | MacroGenics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leveraging the adaptive immune system to diagnose and treat disease. | Biopharmaceutical company developing antibody-based therapeutics for cancer and autoimmune diseases. |
| Category | Biotech, HealthTech, Genomics, Drug Discovery | Biotech, MedTech, HealthTech, Genomics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, United States | Rockville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Adaptive Biotechnologies | MacroGenics |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $300M | $13.5M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Adaptive Biotechnologies | MacroGenics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 36/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 12/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Adaptive Biotechnologies | MacroGenics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Google Cloud |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
Adaptive Biotechnologies vs MacroGenics: common questions
Which is better, Adaptive Biotechnologies or MacroGenics?
On our 0-100 score Adaptive Biotechnologies rates higher (69/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Adaptive Biotechnologies and MacroGenics compare on the numbers?
Adaptive Biotechnologies leads on our overall score (69/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 35/100), domain rating (61/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($300M against $13.5M).
Read the full Adaptive Biotechnologies review and pricing or the MacroGenics review and pricing. You can also browse other Adaptive Biotechnologies alternatives we track.