Adam vs Onshape
Adam vs Onshape, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Adam is on 57/100 and Onshape on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Adam
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 32/100
- headcount growth: +62.7% against +23.4%
- funding raised: $508M against $89.0M
Onshape
- our overall score: 62/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 233 against 13
- LinkedIn following: 42,342 against 4,273
At a glance
| Measure | Adam | Onshape |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Adam is an AI-powered CAD co-pilot that generates 3D models from text descriptions in seconds. | Cloud-native 3D CAD and PDM platform for collaborative product development. |
| Category | AI Copilot, Generative AI, 3D Modeling, CAD Software | CAD, Product Data Management, Cloud Native, SaaS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Adam | Onshape |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 13 | 233 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +62.7% | +23.4% |
| Open roles | Not published | 100 |
| Total funding | $508M | $89.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,273 | 42,342 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Adam | Onshape |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Adam | Onshape |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Adam | Onshape |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Text to Mesh, Text to CAD, Adam Copilot | Not published |
Adam vs Onshape: common questions
Which is better, Adam or Onshape?
On our 0-100 score Onshape rates higher (62/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Adam and Onshape compare on the numbers?
Adam leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 32/100), headcount growth (+62.7% against +23.4%), funding raised ($508M against $89.0M). Onshape leads on our overall score (62/100 against 57/100), domain rating (78/100 against 46/100), headcount (233 against 13), LinkedIn following (42,342 against 4,273).
Read the full Adam review and pricing or the Onshape review and pricing. You can also browse other Adam alternatives we track.