Adallom vs Guardium
Adallom vs Guardium, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Adallom is on 62/100 and Guardium on 34/100.
Where each one leads
Adallom
- our overall score: 62/100 against 34/100
- funding raised: $86.0M against $35.8M
Guardium
- agent readiness: 31/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 336,401 against 6
- LinkedIn following: 19,634,656 against 1,805
At a glance
| Measure | Adallom | Guardium |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Adallom developed a cloud access security broker (CASB) platform that leveraged AI to detect anomalies in data usage across SaaS applications. | Comprehensive data security platform for real-time monitoring, vulnerability assessment, and compliance reporting. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Information Technology (IT), Logs | Enterprise, Security, Cybersecurity, Data Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Waltham, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Adallom | Guardium |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 336,401 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $86.0M | $35.8M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| Valuation | $110M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,805 | 19,634,656 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Adallom | Guardium |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 34/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 30/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 44/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Adallom | Guardium |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Microsoft Clarity |
Adallom vs Guardium: common questions
Which is better, Adallom or Guardium?
On our 0-100 score Adallom rates higher (62/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Adallom and Guardium compare on the numbers?
Adallom leads on our overall score (62/100 against 34/100), funding raised ($86.0M against $35.8M). Guardium leads on agent readiness (31/100 against 22/100), domain rating (92/100 against 44/100), headcount (336,401 against 6), LinkedIn following (19,634,656 against 1,805).
Read the full Adallom review and pricing or the Guardium review and pricing. You can also browse other Adallom alternatives we track.