Actiview.io vs Gloat
Actiview.io vs Gloat, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Actiview.io is on 55/100 and Gloat on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Actiview.io
- headcount growth: +6.5% against -13.4%
Gloat
- our overall score: 62/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 12/100
- headcount: 132 against 25
- funding raised: $182M against $16.5M
- LinkedIn following: 77,174 against 808
At a glance
| Measure | Actiview.io | Gloat |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ActiView is an HR Tech company using virtual simulations and gamified tests for recruitment and talent development. | Gloat's Agile Workforce Operating System uses AI to help enterprises manage talent, skills, and internal mobility. |
| Category | Enterprise, HR, Recruitment, MR | Enterprise, HR, Sourcing, Candidate Identification |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C, B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Actiview.io | Gloat |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 25 | 132 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +6.5% | -13.4% |
| Total funding | $16.5M | $182M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $900M |
| LinkedIn followers | 808 | 77,174 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Actiview.io | Gloat |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 12/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Actiview.io | Gloat |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Actiview.io vs Gloat: common questions
Which is better, Actiview.io or Gloat?
On our 0-100 score Gloat rates higher (62/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Actiview.io and Gloat compare on the numbers?
Actiview.io leads on headcount growth (+6.5% against -13.4%). Gloat leads on our overall score (62/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 25/100), domain rating (66/100 against 12/100), headcount (132 against 25), funding raised ($182M against $16.5M), LinkedIn following (77,174 against 808).
Read the full Actiview.io review and pricing or the Gloat review and pricing. You can also browse other Actiview.io alternatives we track.