ActiveFence vs Pixmole Technologies
ActiveFence vs Pixmole Technologies, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ActiveFence is on 63/100 and Pixmole Technologies on 29/100.
Where each one leads
ActiveFence
- our overall score: 63/100 against 29/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 4/100
- headcount: 420 against 11
- LinkedIn following: 35,726 against 1,658
Pixmole Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | ActiveFence | Pixmole Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Trust and Safety platform protecting online platforms from malicious behavior and content. | Image copyright monitoring and enforcement using cyber intelligence and photography. |
| Category | New Media, Security, Media, Child Monitor | New Media, Copyright, Detection, Copyright Enforcement |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C, B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ActiveFence | Pixmole Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 420 | 11 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +16.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $95.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Bootstrapped |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 35,726 | 1,658 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Pixmole Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 11/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 4/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Pixmole Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
ActiveFence vs Pixmole Technologies: common questions
Which is better, ActiveFence or Pixmole Technologies?
On our 0-100 score ActiveFence rates higher (63/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ActiveFence and Pixmole Technologies compare on the numbers?
ActiveFence leads on our overall score (63/100 against 29/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 21/100), domain rating (62/100 against 4/100), headcount (420 against 11), LinkedIn following (35,726 against 1,658).
Read the full ActiveFence review and pricing or the Pixmole Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other ActiveFence alternatives we track.