ActiveFence vs Hive
ActiveFence vs Hive, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ActiveFence is on 63/100 and Hive on 53/100.
Where each one leads
ActiveFence
- our overall score: 63/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 26/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 10/100
- headcount: 420 against 50
- funding raised: $95.0M against $16.0M
- LinkedIn following: 35,726 against 1,500
Hive
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | ActiveFence | Hive |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Trust and Safety platform protecting online platforms from malicious behavior and content. | Technology for understanding audiences, sentiments, and content reliability on digital platforms. |
| Category | New Media, Security, Media, Child Monitor | Social Media, Audience Segmentation, Market Intelligence, Marketing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ActiveFence | Hive |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 420 | 50 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +16.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $95.0M | $16.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | pre-Series A |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 35,726 | 1,500 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Hive |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Hive |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
ActiveFence vs Hive: common questions
Which is better, ActiveFence or Hive?
On our 0-100 score ActiveFence rates higher (63/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ActiveFence and Hive compare on the numbers?
ActiveFence leads on our overall score (63/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 26/100), domain rating (62/100 against 10/100), headcount (420 against 50), funding raised ($95.0M against $16.0M), LinkedIn following (35,726 against 1,500).
Read the full ActiveFence review and pricing or the Hive review and pricing. You can also browse other ActiveFence alternatives we track.