ActiveFence vs Hexagate
ActiveFence vs Hexagate, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ActiveFence is on 63/100 and Hexagate on 48/100.
Where each one leads
ActiveFence
- our overall score: 63/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 420 against 10
- LinkedIn following: 35,726 against 238
Hexagate
- domain rating: 83/100 against 62/100
- headcount growth: +32.2% against +16.1%
At a glance
| Measure | ActiveFence | Hexagate |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Trust and Safety platform protecting online platforms from malicious behavior and content. | Web3 runtime security platform protecting users and assets from phishing, fraud, scams, and exploits. |
| Category | New Media, Security, Media, Child Monitor | Wallet, Web3, Cybersecurity, Fraud Prevention |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ActiveFence | Hexagate |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 420 | 10 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +16.1% | +32.2% |
| Total funding | $95.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 35,726 | 238 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Hexagate |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 10/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 27/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Hexagate |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
ActiveFence vs Hexagate: common questions
Which is better, ActiveFence or Hexagate?
On our 0-100 score ActiveFence rates higher (63/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ActiveFence and Hexagate compare on the numbers?
ActiveFence leads on our overall score (63/100 against 48/100), headcount (420 against 10), LinkedIn following (35,726 against 238). Hexagate leads on domain rating (83/100 against 62/100), headcount growth (+32.2% against +16.1%).
Read the full ActiveFence review and pricing or the Hexagate review and pricing. You can also browse other ActiveFence alternatives we track.