ActiveFence vs Deepnen
ActiveFence vs Deepnen, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ActiveFence is on 63/100 and Deepnen on 41/100.
Where each one leads
ActiveFence
- our overall score: 63/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 420 against 3
Deepnen
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | ActiveFence | Deepnen |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Trust and Safety platform protecting online platforms from malicious behavior and content. | Developed web-based applications using deep convolutional networks for visual understanding, offered for free. |
| Category | New Media, Security, Media, Child Monitor | New Media, Creation, Computer Vision, Deep Learning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ActiveFence | Deepnen |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 420 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +16.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $95.0M | $115M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series F |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 35,726 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Deepnen |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 1/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Deepnen |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
ActiveFence vs Deepnen: common questions
Which is better, ActiveFence or Deepnen?
On our 0-100 score ActiveFence rates higher (63/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ActiveFence and Deepnen compare on the numbers?
ActiveFence leads on our overall score (63/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 30/100), domain rating (62/100 against 1/100), headcount (420 against 3).
Read the full ActiveFence review and pricing or the Deepnen review and pricing. You can also browse other ActiveFence alternatives we track.