ActiveFence vs Cyabra
ActiveFence vs Cyabra, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ActiveFence is on 63/100 and Cyabra on 57/100.
Where each one leads
ActiveFence
- our overall score: 63/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 420 against 75
- funding raised: $95.0M against $13.3M
- LinkedIn following: 35,726 against 10,800
Cyabra
- headcount growth: +34.5% against +16.1%
At a glance
| Measure | ActiveFence | Cyabra |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Trust and Safety platform protecting online platforms from malicious behavior and content. | Restoring trust and authenticity for global enterprises and governments. |
| Category | New Media, Security, Media, Child Monitor | New Media, Fake News, Deepfake, Media |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B,B2G |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ActiveFence | Cyabra |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 420 | 75 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +16.1% | +34.5% |
| Total funding | $95.0M | $13.3M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 35,726 | 10,800 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Cyabra |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Cyabra |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
ActiveFence vs Cyabra: common questions
Which is better, ActiveFence or Cyabra?
On our 0-100 score ActiveFence rates higher (63/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ActiveFence and Cyabra compare on the numbers?
ActiveFence leads on our overall score (63/100 against 57/100), headcount (420 against 75), funding raised ($95.0M against $13.3M), LinkedIn following (35,726 against 10,800). Cyabra leads on headcount growth (+34.5% against +16.1%).
Read the full ActiveFence review and pricing or the Cyabra review and pricing. You can also browse other ActiveFence alternatives we track.