ActiveFence vs Coalition for Independent Technology Research
ActiveFence vs Coalition for Independent Technology Research, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ActiveFence is on 63/100 and Coalition for Independent Technology Research on 7/100.
Where each one leads
ActiveFence
- our overall score: 63/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 22/100
Coalition for Independent Technology Research
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | ActiveFence | Coalition for Independent Technology Research |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Trust and Safety platform protecting online platforms from malicious behavior and content. | Advocacy organization defending the right to ethically study technology's impact on society. |
| Category | New Media, Security, Media, Child Monitor | Advocacy, Technology Research, Free Speech, Online Safety |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ActiveFence | Coalition for Independent Technology Research |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 420 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +16.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $95.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 35,726 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Coalition for Independent Technology Research |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ActiveFence | Coalition for Independent Technology Research |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | ActiveFence | Coalition for Independent Technology Research |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 5 negative across 5 threads |
“Reddit’s Actions Continue to Undermine Moderation & Research (Coalition for Independent Technology Research Report).”r/ModCoord
ActiveFence vs Coalition for Independent Technology Research: common questions
Which is better, ActiveFence or Coalition for Independent Technology Research?
On our 0-100 score ActiveFence rates higher (63/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ActiveFence and Coalition for Independent Technology Research compare on the numbers?
ActiveFence leads on our overall score (63/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 22/100).
What do real users say about ActiveFence and Coalition for Independent Technology Research?
Coalition for Independent Technology Research: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ModCoord.
Read the full ActiveFence review and pricing or the Coalition for Independent Technology Research review and pricing. You can also browse other ActiveFence alternatives we track.