Active Vision vs Scandit
Active Vision vs Scandit, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Active Vision is on 37/100 and Scandit on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Active Vision
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Scandit
- our overall score: 67/100 against 37/100
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 0/100
- funding raised: $268M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Active Vision | Scandit |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered computer vision for industrial automation and quality control. | Smart data capture platform using computer vision and AR for enterprise workflows. |
| Category | Computer Vision, Industrial Automation, Quality Control, Robotics | Computer Vision, Augmented Reality, Enterprise Software, Barcode Scanning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Zurich, Switzerland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Active Vision | Scandit |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 359 |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $268M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 82,902 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Active Vision | Scandit |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 37/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 52/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Active Vision | Scandit |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Active Vision vs Scandit: common questions
Which is better, Active Vision or Scandit?
On our 0-100 score Scandit rates higher (67/100 against 37/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Active Vision and Scandit compare on the numbers?
Scandit leads on our overall score (67/100 against 37/100), agent readiness (54/100 against 41/100), domain rating (72/100 against 0/100), funding raised ($268M against $1.0M).
Read the full Active Vision review and pricing or the Scandit review and pricing. You can also browse other Active Vision alternatives we track.