Across AI vs Mastra
Across AI vs Mastra, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Across AI is on 53/100 and Mastra on 77/100.
Where each one leads
Across AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Mastra
- our overall score: 77/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 9/100
- headcount: 53 against 17
- funding raised: $35.5M against $5.8M
- LinkedIn following: 6,591 against 2,232
At a glance
| Measure | Across AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Across AI is an SF-based startup pioneering agentic AI for enterprise workflows, leveraging next-generation agentic memory to provide accurate, verifiable insights and actionable recommendations for sales teams. | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. |
| Category | Agentic AI | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Across AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +204.5% |
| Total funding | $5.8M | $35.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,232 | 6,591 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Across AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 70/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 38/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 68/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 9/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Across AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | No | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Across AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Agentic AI for Enterprise Workflows, Next-Generation Agentic Memory, Accurate, Verifiable Insights & Actionable Recommendations, Human-Centered AI Ethos, Automates Sales Cycle Processes, Groundbreaking Algorithmic Approaches | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular |
What users say
| Measure | Across AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 2 votes |
Across AI vs Mastra: common questions
Which is better, Across AI or Mastra?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (77/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Across AI and Mastra compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (77/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 44/100), domain rating (76/100 against 9/100), headcount (53 against 17), funding raised ($35.5M against $5.8M), LinkedIn following (6,591 against 2,232).
Read the full Across AI review and pricing or the Mastra review and pricing. You can also browse other Across AI alternatives we track.