Across AI vs Manus AI
Across AI vs Manus AI, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Across AI is on 53/100 and Manus AI on 75/100.
Where each one leads
Across AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Manus AI
- our overall score: 75/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 87/100 against 9/100
- headcount: 137 against 17
- funding raised: $150M against $5.8M
- LinkedIn following: 124,524 against 2,232
At a glance
| Measure | Across AI | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Across AI is an SF-based startup pioneering agentic AI for enterprise workflows, leveraging next-generation agentic memory to provide accurate, verifiable insights and actionable recommendations for sales teams. | The general AI agent that turns your thoughts into actions. |
| Category | Agentic AI | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Generative AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Singapore, Singapore |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Across AI | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 137 |
| Total funding | $5.8M | $150M |
| Valuation | Not published | $500M |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,232 | 124,524 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Across AI | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 75/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 75/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 74/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 9/100 | 87/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Across AI | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Plausible |
| Open source | No | Yes, 42,600 GitHub stars |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Across AI | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Agentic AI for Enterprise Workflows, Next-Generation Agentic Memory, Accurate, Verifiable Insights & Actionable Recommendations, Human-Centered AI Ethos, Automates Sales Cycle Processes, Groundbreaking Algorithmic Approaches | General AI Agent, Secure Execution, Investor-Ready Deck Generation, Wide Research Approach, Script to Storyboard Conversion, Automated Trend Monitoring |
Across AI vs Manus AI: common questions
Which is better, Across AI or Manus AI?
On our 0-100 score Manus AI rates higher (75/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Across AI and Manus AI compare on the numbers?
Manus AI leads on our overall score (75/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 44/100), domain rating (87/100 against 9/100), headcount (137 against 17), funding raised ($150M against $5.8M), LinkedIn following (124,524 against 2,232).
Read the full Across AI review and pricing or the Manus AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Across AI alternatives we track.