Acquia vs Red Hat
Acquia vs Red Hat, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Acquia is on 55/100 and Red Hat on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Acquia
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 46/100
Red Hat
- our overall score: 61/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 5,000 against 1,096
At a glance
| Measure | Acquia | Red Hat |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digital experience platform providing enterprise-grade cloud solutions based on the open-source Drupal CMS. | Open source solutions for enterprise cloud. |
| Category | SaaS, Cloud Computing, Content Management | Software, Cloud Computing, Enterprise Software, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2007 | 1993 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Raleigh, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Acquia | Red Hat |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,096 | 5,000 |
| Total funding | $174M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series G | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Acquia | Red Hat |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 95/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Acquia | Red Hat |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Acquia vs Red Hat: common questions
Which is better, Acquia or Red Hat?
On our 0-100 score Red Hat rates higher (61/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Acquia and Red Hat compare on the numbers?
Acquia leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 46/100). Red Hat leads on our overall score (61/100 against 55/100), headcount (5,000 against 1,096).
Read the full Acquia review and pricing or the Red Hat review and pricing. You can also browse other Acquia alternatives we track.