Accesspatch vs Cursor
Accesspatch vs Cursor, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Accesspatch is on 3/100 and Cursor on 77/100.
Where each one leads
Accesspatch
- agent readiness: 62/100 against 47/100
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 3/100
At a glance
| Measure | Accesspatch | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Continuously scan your sites for accessibility violations and get the actual code fix for each one. No overlay widgets. | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. |
| Category | Accessibility Software, Web Accessibility, Compliance Software, Developer Tools | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Accesspatch | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 1,081 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $2.9B |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $50B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 361,335 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Accesspatch | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 3/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 83/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 93/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (62/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Accesspatch | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Accesspatch | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | Not published | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra |
Accesspatch vs Cursor: common questions
Which is better, Accesspatch or Cursor?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 3/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Accesspatch and Cursor compare on the numbers?
Accesspatch leads on agent readiness (62/100 against 47/100). Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 3/100).
Read the full Accesspatch review and pricing or the Cursor review and pricing. You can also browse other Accesspatch alternatives we track.