Accesspatch vs Cursor (Anysphere)
Accesspatch vs Cursor (Anysphere), compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Accesspatch is on 3/100 and Cursor (Anysphere) on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Accesspatch
- agent readiness: 62/100 against 47/100
Cursor (Anysphere)
- our overall score: 68/100 against 3/100
At a glance
| Measure | Accesspatch | Cursor (Anysphere) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Continuously scan your sites for accessibility violations and get the actual code fix for each one. No overlay widgets. | Cursor is an AI code editor built to make you extraordinarily productive by coding with AI. |
| Category | Accessibility Software, Web Accessibility, Compliance Software, Developer Tools | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Code Editor, AI Coding Assistant |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Accesspatch | Cursor (Anysphere) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 125 |
| Total funding | Not published | $4.8B |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $29B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 43,638 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Accesspatch | Cursor (Anysphere) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 3/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 71/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (62/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Accesspatch | Cursor (Anysphere) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Accesspatch | Cursor (Anysphere) |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI-Powered Code Completion, Codebase Awareness, Natural Language Editing, Background Agents, Bug Bot Integration, Privacy Mode |
| Current offer | Not published | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra |
Accesspatch vs Cursor (Anysphere): common questions
Which is better, Accesspatch or Cursor (Anysphere)?
On our 0-100 score Cursor (Anysphere) rates higher (68/100 against 3/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Accesspatch and Cursor (Anysphere) compare on the numbers?
Accesspatch leads on agent readiness (62/100 against 47/100). Cursor (Anysphere) leads on our overall score (68/100 against 3/100).
Read the full Accesspatch review and pricing or the Cursor (Anysphere) review and pricing. You can also browse other Accesspatch alternatives we track.