accessiBe vs Level Access
accessiBe vs Level Access, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: accessiBe is on 63/100 and Level Access on 49/100.
Where each one leads
accessiBe
- our overall score: 63/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 39/100
- funding raised: $58.0M against $40.0M
Level Access
- headcount: 518 against 209
At a glance
| Measure | accessiBe | Level Access |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered web accessibility solutions for ADA and WCAG compliance. | Digital accessibility platform providing software and services to ensure compliance and inclusive digital experiences. |
| Category | Web Accessibility, Compliance Software, AI-Powered Tools, Digital Inclusion | SaaS, Accessibility, Compliance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Arlington, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | accessiBe | Level Access |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | 518 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +19.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $58.0M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,695 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | accessiBe | Level Access |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 85/100 | 89/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | accessiBe | Level Access |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Zendesk | HubSpot |
accessiBe vs Level Access: common questions
Which is better, accessiBe or Level Access?
On our 0-100 score accessiBe rates higher (63/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do accessiBe and Level Access compare on the numbers?
accessiBe leads on our overall score (63/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($58.0M against $40.0M). Level Access leads on headcount (518 against 209).
Read the full accessiBe review and pricing or the Level Access review and pricing. You can also browse other accessiBe alternatives we track.

