accessiBe vs EqualWeb
accessiBe vs EqualWeb, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: accessiBe is on 63/100 and EqualWeb on 36/100.
Where each one leads
accessiBe
- our overall score: 63/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 85/100 against 74/100
- headcount: 209 against 34
- headcount growth: +19.1% against +5.5%
- LinkedIn following: 27,695 against 4,539
EqualWeb
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | accessiBe | EqualWeb |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered web accessibility solutions for ADA and WCAG compliance. | Automated digital accessibility compliance solutions for websites and mobile applications. |
| Category | Web Accessibility, Compliance Software, AI-Powered Tools, Digital Inclusion | Web Accessibility, Digital Compliance, Accessibility Software, WCAG Compliance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | accessiBe | EqualWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +19.1% | +5.5% |
| Total funding | $58.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,695 | 4,539 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | accessiBe | EqualWeb |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 36/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 15/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 85/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | accessiBe | EqualWeb |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
accessiBe vs EqualWeb: common questions
Which is better, accessiBe or EqualWeb?
On our 0-100 score accessiBe rates higher (63/100 against 36/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do accessiBe and EqualWeb compare on the numbers?
accessiBe leads on our overall score (63/100 against 36/100), domain rating (85/100 against 74/100), headcount (209 against 34), headcount growth (+19.1% against +5.5%), LinkedIn following (27,695 against 4,539).
Read the full accessiBe review and pricing or the EqualWeb review and pricing. You can also browse other accessiBe alternatives we track.