accessiBe vs AudioEye
accessiBe vs AudioEye, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: accessiBe is on 63/100 and AudioEye on 56/100.
Where each one leads
accessiBe
- our overall score: 63/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 209 against 100
- funding raised: $58.0M against $6.5M
AudioEye
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | accessiBe | AudioEye |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered web accessibility solutions for ADA and WCAG compliance. | Digital accessibility platform combining AI automation and human expertise for website compliance and inclusion. |
| Category | Web Accessibility, Compliance Software, AI-Powered Tools, Digital Inclusion | Accessibility, SaaS, Web Development, Compliance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tucson, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | accessiBe | AudioEye |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | 100 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +19.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $58.0M | $6.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Post IPO |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,695 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | accessiBe | AudioEye |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 85/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | accessiBe | AudioEye |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
accessiBe vs AudioEye: common questions
Which is better, accessiBe or AudioEye?
On our 0-100 score accessiBe rates higher (63/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do accessiBe and AudioEye compare on the numbers?
accessiBe leads on our overall score (63/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 21/100), headcount (209 against 100), funding raised ($58.0M against $6.5M).
Read the full accessiBe review and pricing or the AudioEye review and pricing. You can also browse other accessiBe alternatives we track.