Access Code vs Cursor
Access Code vs Cursor, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Access Code is on 7/100 and Cursor on 77/100.
Where each one leads
Access Code
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | Access Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building inclusive digital solutions that reduce barriers and create better experiences for everyone. | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. |
| Category | Digital Inclusion, Accessibility, Inclusive Design, Web Development | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2026 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Kathmandu, Nepal | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Access Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 1,081 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $2.9B |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $50B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 361,335 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Access Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 83/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 93/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Access Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Access Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | Not published | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra |
Access Code vs Cursor: common questions
Which is better, Access Code or Cursor?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Access Code and Cursor compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 30/100).
Read the full Access Code review and pricing or the Cursor review and pricing. You can also browse other Access Code alternatives we track.