AcceloWeb vs Cloudinary
AcceloWeb vs Cloudinary, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AcceloWeb is on 49/100 and Cloudinary on 72/100.
Where each one leads
AcceloWeb
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cloudinary
- our overall score: 72/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 452 against 11
- funding raised: $110M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 72,105 against 24
At a glance
| Measure | AcceloWeb | Cloudinary |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AcceloWeb accelerates website loading times to boost online business performance and user experience. | Cloudinary is a cloud-based media management platform that enables developers and marketers to upload, store, manage, transform, and deliver images and videos. |
| Category | Web Performance, Website Acceleration, Content Delivery Network, E-commerce Optimization | Media, Management, Video, Media Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AcceloWeb | Cloudinary |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 11 | 452 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.1% |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $110M |
| Latest round | Seed | Secondary Transaction |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 24 | 72,105 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AcceloWeb | Cloudinary |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 72/100 |
| Traction | 41/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 19/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 83/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 2/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AcceloWeb | Cloudinary |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Jetpack Stats |
What users say
| Measure | AcceloWeb | Cloudinary |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads |
“Usually when I'm making a WordPress site for a class or for myself, I use my personal Cloudinary account with the Cloudinary plugin, but for a client site this doesn't sound like a good idea, since my account has other images for other webs”r/webdev
AcceloWeb vs Cloudinary: common questions
Which is better, AcceloWeb or Cloudinary?
On our 0-100 score Cloudinary rates higher (72/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AcceloWeb and Cloudinary compare on the numbers?
Cloudinary leads on our overall score (72/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), domain rating (91/100 against 2/100), headcount (452 against 11), funding raised ($110M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (72,105 against 24).
What do real users say about AcceloWeb and Cloudinary?
Cloudinary: 0 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/webdev.
Read the full AcceloWeb review and pricing or the Cloudinary review and pricing. You can also browse other AcceloWeb alternatives we track.