Accelerant Holdings vs At-Bay
Accelerant Holdings vs At-Bay, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Accelerant Holdings is on 66/100 and At-Bay on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Accelerant Holdings
- headcount: 649 against 359
- LinkedIn following: 112,537 against 20,419
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 66/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 41/100
- funding raised: $292M against $150M
At a glance
| Measure | Accelerant Holdings | At-Bay |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A cloud platform connecting specialty insurance MGAs with insurers and other capital providers, enabling access to capital for underwriting through advanced analytics and real-time data. | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. |
| Category | InsurTech, Artificial Intelligence, Fintech, Specialty Insurance | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Atlanta, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Accelerant Holdings | At-Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 649 | 359 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +18.9% |
| Total funding | $150M | $292M |
| Latest round | PE | Series D |
| Valuation | $4.0B | $1.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 112,537 | 20,419 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Accelerant Holdings | At-Bay |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Accelerant Holdings | At-Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Accelerant Holdings vs At-Bay: common questions
Which is better, Accelerant Holdings or At-Bay?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Accelerant Holdings and At-Bay compare on the numbers?
Accelerant Holdings leads on headcount (649 against 359), LinkedIn following (112,537 against 20,419). At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 66/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 41/100), funding raised ($292M against $150M).
Read the full Accelerant Holdings review and pricing or the At-Bay review and pricing. You can also browse other Accelerant Holdings alternatives we track.