Abound vs Hourly
Abound vs Hourly, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Abound is on 49/100 and Hourly on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Abound
- domain rating: 73/100 against 64/100
- headcount: 1,326 against 125
- LinkedIn following: 36,311 against 15,506
Hourly
- our overall score: 59/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $44.2M against $22.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Abound | Hourly |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Financial wellness platform for independent workers, offering health insurance, retirement, and financial planning. | All-in-one platform for payroll, workers' compensation, and HR for small businesses. |
| Category | Fintech, InsurTech, Freelancer Economy, Gig Economy | Fintech, Tax, Payroll, InsurTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Abound | Hourly |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,326 | 125 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -1.9% |
| Total funding | $22.5M | $44.2M |
| Latest round | Series A | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 36,311 | 15,506 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Abound | Hourly |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Abound | Hourly |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Abound vs Hourly: common questions
Which is better, Abound or Hourly?
On our 0-100 score Hourly rates higher (59/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Abound and Hourly compare on the numbers?
Abound leads on domain rating (73/100 against 64/100), headcount (1,326 against 125), LinkedIn following (36,311 against 15,506). Hourly leads on our overall score (59/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (30/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($44.2M against $22.5M).
Read the full Abound review and pricing or the Hourly review and pricing. You can also browse other Abound alternatives we track.