Abacus vs MinerEye
Abacus vs MinerEye, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Abacus is on 52/100 and MinerEye on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Abacus
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 21/100
MinerEye
- domain rating: 41/100 against 29/100
- funding raised: $14.6M against $6.6M
At a glance
| Measure | Abacus | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | On-premise AI infrastructure for regulated industries, ensuring data control, security, and compliance. | MinerEye provides AI-powered data governance and protection solutions for unstructured and dark data across enterprise repositories. |
| Category | Finance, Agentic AI, AI Tools & Apps, Fintech | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Data Protection, Privacy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Abacus | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 5 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -21.3% |
| Total funding | $6.6M | $14.6M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 852 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Abacus | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 34/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Abacus | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Hetzner |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Abacus vs MinerEye: common questions
Which is better, Abacus or MinerEye?
On our 0-100 score MinerEye rates higher (53/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Abacus and MinerEye compare on the numbers?
Abacus leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 21/100). MinerEye leads on domain rating (41/100 against 29/100), funding raised ($14.6M against $6.6M).
Read the full Abacus review and pricing or the MinerEye review and pricing. You can also browse other Abacus alternatives we track.