Abacus.AI vs Iris.ai
Abacus.AI vs Iris.ai, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Abacus.AI is on 65/100 and Iris.ai on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Abacus.AI
- our overall score: 65/100 against 58/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 259 against 40
- headcount growth: +135.1% against -25.9%
- funding raised: $90.3M against $10.4M
- LinkedIn following: 194,723 against 10,536
Iris.ai
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 44/100
At a glance
| Measure | Abacus.AI | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An enterprise AI platform for building and deploying generative AI applications and machine learning models. | AI knowledge foundation for regulated enterprises, turning complex data into AI you can trust. |
| Category | AI Foundation & Compute, MLOps & DevInfra, AI Tools & Apps, Generative AI | AI Foundation & Compute, Agentic AI, RAG, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Oslo, Norway |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Abacus.AI | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 259 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +135.1% | -25.9% |
| Total funding | $90.3M | $10.4M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| Valuation | $322M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 194,723 | 10,536 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Abacus.AI | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 18/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 49/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Abacus.AI | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Angular, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Abacus.AI | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 4.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 4 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Recently tried Abacus AI (ChatLLM) out of curiosity, and honestly… it made me rethink how I use AI tools. From what I understand, ChatLLM is not just a single model like ChatGPT, it gives access to multiple models in one place (GPT, Claude,”r/abacusai
Abacus.AI vs Iris.ai: common questions
Which is better, Abacus.AI or Iris.ai?
On our 0-100 score Abacus.AI rates higher (65/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Abacus.AI and Iris.ai compare on the numbers?
Abacus.AI leads on our overall score (65/100 against 58/100), domain rating (72/100 against 60/100), headcount (259 against 40), headcount growth (+135.1% against -25.9%), funding raised ($90.3M against $10.4M), LinkedIn following (194,723 against 10,536). Iris.ai leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 44/100).
What do real users say about Abacus.AI and Iris.ai?
Abacus.AI: 1 positive and 4 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/abacusai.
Read the full Abacus.AI review and pricing or the Iris.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Abacus.AI alternatives we track.