Abacus.AI vs InnerEye
Abacus.AI vs InnerEye, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Abacus.AI is on 65/100 and InnerEye on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Abacus.AI
- our overall score: 65/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 24/100
- headcount: 259 against 23
- headcount growth: +135.1% against +4.7%
- funding raised: $90.3M against $13.3M
- LinkedIn following: 194,723 against 2,077
InnerEye
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Abacus.AI | InnerEye |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An enterprise AI platform for building and deploying generative AI applications and machine learning models. | Fusing human intelligence with AI for trusted, complex decision-making and accelerated AI applicability. |
| Category | AI Foundation & Compute, MLOps & DevInfra, AI Tools & Apps, Generative AI | Data Annotation, Data, Neurotech & HCI, AI Tools & Apps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Herzliya, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Abacus.AI | InnerEye |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 259 | 23 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +135.1% | +4.7% |
| Total funding | $90.3M | $13.3M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| Valuation | $322M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 194,723 | 2,077 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Abacus.AI | InnerEye |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 18/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 49/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 24/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Abacus.AI | InnerEye |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Abacus.AI | InnerEye |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 4.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 4 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Recently tried Abacus AI (ChatLLM) out of curiosity, and honestly… it made me rethink how I use AI tools. From what I understand, ChatLLM is not just a single model like ChatGPT, it gives access to multiple models in one place (GPT, Claude,”r/abacusai
Abacus.AI vs InnerEye: common questions
Which is better, Abacus.AI or InnerEye?
On our 0-100 score Abacus.AI rates higher (65/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Abacus.AI and InnerEye compare on the numbers?
Abacus.AI leads on our overall score (65/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 21/100), domain rating (72/100 against 24/100), headcount (259 against 23), headcount growth (+135.1% against +4.7%), funding raised ($90.3M against $13.3M), LinkedIn following (194,723 against 2,077).
What do real users say about Abacus.AI and InnerEye?
Abacus.AI: 1 positive and 4 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/abacusai.
Read the full Abacus.AI review and pricing or the InnerEye review and pricing. You can also browse other Abacus.AI alternatives we track.