A.Team vs Stigg
A.Team vs Stigg, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: A.Team is on 64/100 and Stigg on 62/100.
Where each one leads
A.Team
- domain rating: 59/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 228 against 43
- funding raised: $70.0M against $23.9M
- LinkedIn following: 22,991 against 4,895
Stigg
- headcount growth: +45.2% against +14.8%
At a glance
| Measure | A.Team | Stigg |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Members-only network of top engineers, PMs, designers, and marketers for accelerated product development. | Developer-first platform for flexible SaaS pricing and packaging. |
| Category | Enterprise, Network, Talent, Product Development | Enterprise, Pricing, DevTools, Product Development |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | A.Team | Stigg |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 228 | 43 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.8% | +45.2% |
| Open roles | 2 | Not published |
| Total funding | $70.0M | $23.9M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,991 | 4,895 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | A.Team | Stigg |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | A.Team | Stigg |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
A.Team vs Stigg: common questions
Which is better, A.Team or Stigg?
On our 0-100 score A.Team rates higher (64/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do A.Team and Stigg compare on the numbers?
A.Team leads on domain rating (59/100 against 52/100), headcount (228 against 43), funding raised ($70.0M against $23.9M), LinkedIn following (22,991 against 4,895). Stigg leads on headcount growth (+45.2% against +14.8%).
Read the full A.Team review and pricing or the Stigg review and pricing. You can also browse other A.Team alternatives we track.