A.Team vs Retrain.ai
A.Team vs Retrain.ai, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: A.Team is on 64/100 and Retrain.ai on 55/100.
Where each one leads
A.Team
- our overall score: 64/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 228 against 14
- headcount growth: +14.8% against -37.8%
- funding raised: $70.0M against $34.0M
- LinkedIn following: 22,991 against 5,850
Retrain.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | A.Team | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Members-only network of top engineers, PMs, designers, and marketers for accelerated product development. | Talent intelligence platform using AI and market data for enterprise hiring and workforce development. |
| Category | Enterprise, Network, Talent, Product Development | Enterprise, Recruiting, Talent, Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | A.Team | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 228 | 14 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.8% | -37.8% |
| Open roles | 2 | Not published |
| Total funding | $70.0M | $34.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,991 | 5,850 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | A.Team | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 44/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | A.Team | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Linkedin Insight |
A.Team vs Retrain.ai: common questions
Which is better, A.Team or Retrain.ai?
On our 0-100 score A.Team rates higher (64/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do A.Team and Retrain.ai compare on the numbers?
A.Team leads on our overall score (64/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 39/100), domain rating (59/100 against 44/100), headcount (228 against 14), headcount growth (+14.8% against -37.8%), funding raised ($70.0M against $34.0M), LinkedIn following (22,991 against 5,850).
Read the full A.Team review and pricing or the Retrain.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other A.Team alternatives we track.