A.Team vs PwC
A.Team vs PwC, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: A.Team is on 64/100 and PwC on 88/100.
Where each one leads
A.Team
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 24/100
PwC
- our overall score: 88/100 against 64/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 297,484 against 228
- funding raised: $400M against $70.0M
- LinkedIn following: 8,076,319 against 22,991
At a glance
| Measure | A.Team | PwC |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Members-only network of top engineers, PMs, designers, and marketers for accelerated product development. | A global professional services firm offering audit, tax, and consulting services, now heavily investing in AI-driven security operations. |
| Category | Enterprise, Network, Talent, Product Development | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Cloud Computing, Professional Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2020 | 1998 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | A.Team | PwC |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 228 | 297,484 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.8% | Not published |
| Open roles | 2 | Not published |
| Total funding | $70.0M | $400M |
| Latest round | Series A | Strategic |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,991 | 8,076,319 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | A.Team | PwC |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 88/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 8/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (24/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | A.Team | PwC |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
A.Team vs PwC: common questions
Which is better, A.Team or PwC?
On our 0-100 score PwC rates higher (88/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do A.Team and PwC compare on the numbers?
A.Team leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 24/100). PwC leads on our overall score (88/100 against 64/100), domain rating (91/100 against 59/100), headcount (297,484 against 228), funding raised ($400M against $70.0M), LinkedIn following (8,076,319 against 22,991).
Read the full A.Team review and pricing or the PwC review and pricing. You can also browse other A.Team alternatives we track.