A.Team vs Perimeter 81
A.Team vs Perimeter 81, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: A.Team is on 64/100 and Perimeter 81 on 69/100.
Where each one leads
A.Team
- headcount: 228 against 97
- headcount growth: +14.8% against -26.3%
Perimeter 81
- our overall score: 69/100 against 64/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 59/100
- funding raised: $155M against $70.0M
- LinkedIn following: 33,562 against 22,991
At a glance
| Measure | A.Team | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Members-only network of top engineers, PMs, designers, and marketers for accelerated product development. | Converged networking and cybersecurity platform for secure remote and office access to all resources. |
| Category | Enterprise, Network, Talent, Product Development | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Network, Network Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | A.Team | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 228 | 97 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.8% | -26.3% |
| Open roles | 2 | Not published |
| Total funding | $70.0M | $155M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,991 | 33,562 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | A.Team | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | A.Team | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom |
A.Team vs Perimeter 81: common questions
Which is better, A.Team or Perimeter 81?
On our 0-100 score Perimeter 81 rates higher (69/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do A.Team and Perimeter 81 compare on the numbers?
A.Team leads on headcount (228 against 97), headcount growth (+14.8% against -26.3%). Perimeter 81 leads on our overall score (69/100 against 64/100), domain rating (90/100 against 59/100), funding raised ($155M against $70.0M), LinkedIn following (33,562 against 22,991).
Read the full A.Team review and pricing or the Perimeter 81 review and pricing. You can also browse other A.Team alternatives we track.