A.Team vs Incompany
A.Team vs Incompany, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: A.Team is on 64/100 and Incompany on 19/100.
Where each one leads
A.Team
- our overall score: 64/100 against 19/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 228 against 23
- LinkedIn following: 22,991 against 1,828
Incompany
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | A.Team | Incompany |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Members-only network of top engineers, PMs, designers, and marketers for accelerated product development. | 17 años, 9 industrias, 9 países. El hub regional de Incompany para encontrar la práctica especializada que tu sector necesita. |
| Category | Enterprise, Network, Talent, Product Development | Professional Services, Business Services, Consulting, Industry Expertise |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | A.Team | Incompany |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 228 | 23 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.8% | Not published |
| Open roles | 2 | Not published |
| Total funding | $70.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,991 | 1,828 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | A.Team | Incompany |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 19/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 14/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 5/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | A.Team | Incompany |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
A.Team vs Incompany: common questions
Which is better, A.Team or Incompany?
On our 0-100 score A.Team rates higher (64/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do A.Team and Incompany compare on the numbers?
A.Team leads on our overall score (64/100 against 19/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 35/100), domain rating (59/100 against 5/100), headcount (228 against 23), LinkedIn following (22,991 against 1,828).
Read the full A.Team review and pricing or the Incompany review and pricing. You can also browse other A.Team alternatives we track.