A.Team vs Human Archive
A.Team vs Human Archive, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: A.Team is on 64/100 and Human Archive on 57/100.
Where each one leads
A.Team
- our overall score: 64/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 26/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 28/100
- funding raised: $70.0M against $8.2M
Human Archive
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | A.Team | Human Archive |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Members-only network of top engineers, PMs, designers, and marketers for accelerated product development. | Collecting real-world physical training data for AI and robotics. |
| Category | Enterprise, Network, Talent, Product Development | Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Data Collection, Machine Learning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2020 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | A.Team | Human Archive |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 228 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.8% | Not published |
| Open roles | 2 | 17 |
| Total funding | $70.0M | $8.2M |
| Latest round | Series A | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,991 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | A.Team | Human Archive |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 18/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 28/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | A.Team | Human Archive |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
A.Team vs Human Archive: common questions
Which is better, A.Team or Human Archive?
On our 0-100 score A.Team rates higher (64/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do A.Team and Human Archive compare on the numbers?
A.Team leads on our overall score (64/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 26/100), domain rating (59/100 against 28/100), funding raised ($70.0M against $8.2M).
Read the full A.Team review and pricing or the Human Archive review and pricing. You can also browse other A.Team alternatives we track.