A.Team vs Curos AI
A.Team vs Curos AI, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: A.Team is on 64/100 and Curos AI on 26/100.
Where each one leads
A.Team
- our overall score: 64/100 against 26/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 26/100
Curos AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | A.Team | Curos AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Members-only network of top engineers, PMs, designers, and marketers for accelerated product development. | Curos connects companies with elite AI engineers and programmers for critical software projects. |
| Category | Enterprise, Network, Talent, Product Development | Freelancer Marketplace, Talent Acquisition, Recruitment Platform, Gig Economy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Marketplace |
| Founded | 2020 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | A.Team | Curos AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 228 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.8% | Not published |
| Open roles | 2 | Not published |
| Total funding | $70.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,991 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | A.Team | Curos AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 26/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | Not published |
| Team | 80/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 40/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | A.Team | Curos AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
A.Team vs Curos AI: common questions
Which is better, A.Team or Curos AI?
On our 0-100 score A.Team rates higher (64/100 against 26/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do A.Team and Curos AI compare on the numbers?
A.Team leads on our overall score (64/100 against 26/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 26/100).
Read the full A.Team review and pricing or the Curos AI review and pricing. You can also browse other A.Team alternatives we track.