500 Startups vs Primary Ventures
500 Startups vs Primary Ventures, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 500 Startups is on 70/100 and Primary Ventures on 30/100.
Where each one leads
500 Startups
- our overall score: 70/100 against 30/100
Primary Ventures
- funding raised: $1.2B against $140M
At a glance
| Measure | 500 Startups | Primary Ventures |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global venture capital firm investing in ambitious founders building fast-growing technology companies. | A venture capital firm focused on seed investing nationwide. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Startup Accelerator, Seed Funding, Early Stage Investing | Venture Capital, Artificial Intelligence, Fintech, Healthcare |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2010 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 500 Startups | Primary Ventures |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,707 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +23.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $140M | $1.2B |
| Latest round | Global Flagship Fund | Venture Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 376,122 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 500 Startups | Primary Ventures |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 40/100 |
| Team | 72/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 14/100 |
| Search visibility | 100/100 | 11/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 500 Startups | Primary Ventures |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | 500 Startups | Primary Ventures |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“500 Startups. We're kind of a big deal. #500strong”r/
500 Startups vs Primary Ventures: common questions
Which is better, 500 Startups or Primary Ventures?
On our 0-100 score 500 Startups rates higher (70/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 500 Startups and Primary Ventures compare on the numbers?
500 Startups leads on our overall score (70/100 against 30/100). Primary Ventures leads on funding raised ($1.2B against $140M).
What do real users say about 500 Startups and Primary Ventures?
500 Startups: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full 500 Startups review and pricing or the Primary Ventures review and pricing. You can also browse other 500 Startups alternatives we track.